Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 02:29

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
How many trans people are lawful gun owners?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What was your first trans experience like?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Galaxy Watch could automatically lock your phone when it's left behind - SamMobile
What’s next?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Astronomers discover most powerful cosmic explosions since the Big Bang - Live Science
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Snakes in the yard … maybe more in the future - ironmountaindailynews.com
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
$80 Xbox games seem like a steal compared to what I'm paying, and I don't like it - Windows Central
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Thank you.